On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Mary Gardiner wrote:

> SLUG committee has had a reporter request the contact details of people
> who are making legitimate (by which I presume he means legal) use of P2P
> technologies. He's looking for 'experts' to comment, but the article is
> for laypeople.
>
> If you are willing to comment on your use of P2P technology, please
> contact the SLUG committee, and we'll pass your details on.

I can't really think of legitimate or good uses (that are actually
current) that could legitimise KaZaa and similar programs.

However, BitTorrent really stands out as a great means for distribution of
a single item, and has been used by a few distributions now I believe for
distribution of their ISOs.

Whilst I'm not sure if I could put anything together that would be useful
for an article, it would be a great topic to focus on.

For those who haven't used BitTorrent, it's basically a P2P application
whereby you download a .torrent file, which contains references to a
"tracking" server.  Once there, you are given a few peers to download bits
of the file from (peers being either seeds - people who have the entire
file already, or other people who are still downloading the file aswell).
This way, everybody helps add to the distribution of a file.

This method works extremely well on new releases of files that are likely
to cause a great rush of high capacity downloading (such as ISO releases
of distributions), because instant of the server being instantly overcome
by the load of billions of people downloading a file, the rush of people
downloading actually causes there to be so many more peers that the actual
drain on the original seed is minimal (or at least, in a relative
context -- there would be a bit of load at first, but as soon as a few
downloaders picked up and started peering, the initial downloads for new
people would be handled by various people already downloading).

This is very different to what the public have come to know as P2P, which
is that you go in a search for something (usually illegal) to download,
and get it straight away.

Search-based P2P applications made for the distribution of (random) data
to me are not really a good idea in a world where copyright infringement
is such a hot issue, and where the public don't feel that the original
content has the value that the price placed upon it represents.

Hmm, I really didn't mean to write that much -- bye now!

Andypoo.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to