yeah sorry. What I was getting at is that i use the make-kpkg process to build my own kernel, just so that I can get ipsec and NAT'ing working on the same box.
But I recently changed my setup so that I don't need NAT'ing and IPSEC on the same box (not ideal), this is so I can go to 2.6.x and the native IPSEC stack. I believe there is going to be a patch for netfilter (soon) which will fix this problem. Which will mean I have to go back to building patched kernel's again. A On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:39:08AM +1000, Simon Wong wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:32, Alexander Samad wrote: > > I use 2.4.22 (from kernel.org), freeswan 2.01-3 (from debian). I use > > process to make the kernel. It comes x509 patch, NAT-T, dead > > connection check, extra ciphers (AES,...) and allows for NAT'ing on the > > box as well. > > What do you mean "process" Alexander? > > I would like to get Freeswan working again in Debian. > > -- > Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
