On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:42:26PM +1000, Benno wrote:
> On Tue Mar 30, 2004 at 17:34:27 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >You could write your own env equivalent.
> >It's quite a simple program.
> 
> And therefore defeating the purpose of using env in the first 
> place :)

Yeah, I meant env plus the bits to custom find your
real interpreter and possibly interpret additional lines
to get the args blah blah of course!  And without doing
anything of things that env really does, like actual env
stuff!

Kids these days.

Matt


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to