On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 21:17, Howard Lowndes wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I belive it's in part because of this:
> > 
> >     Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Bill 2004
> >     http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/browse.aspx?NodeID=173
> > 
> > It will also be illegal to archive emails, or to appraise
> > them as suitable for delivery or not by inspecting them
> > by human eye. (automated methods considered ok)

I don't quite see where you are getting this interpretation from.  The
bulk of the amendments refer to Subsection 6 of the Act, which deals
with lawful interception.

It is interesting to note that the amendments also refer to a Subsection
5D of the Act, but looking at the Act itself on Austlii I cannot see any
Subsection 5D.

-- 
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people <http://www.lannetlinux.com>
------------------------------------------
Flatter government, not fatter government - Get rid of the Australian states.
------------------------------------------
To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it;
to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.
 - Scott Granneman, SecurityFocus

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to