You should start at eth0. So I guess the kernel thinks there is 3 network cards in your machine.
lspci ifconfig -a and see if you can see all three. Glad to here it went well. Greg On Sun, 9 May 2004 11:09 pm, Ramon Buckland wrote: > Just letting people know, (and a question below) > > The upgrade to 2.6 went well and solved my problem. > At first I was completely unable to upgrade (seg faulting somewhere > in the install of the kernel package whilst on 2.5) > > So thankfully I had not removed my last good 2.4 kernel so reverted > to it (lilo worked thankfully) and then proceeded to upgrade. > > All seems good so far. > I had to add psmouse to my /etc/modules list on boot to support > my trackpad (at /dev/psaux), and > my wireless pcmcia NIC moved from eth1 to eth2 so I had to update > /etc/network/interfaces with a line for eth2. > > What's the reason for the netowork card move ? > > Thanks for the help > > ramon > > On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Quoting Ramon Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Learn more why this is so by using commands 'ldd' and 'strace' like this: > > > > #ldd /bin/df > > > > #strace /bin/df > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > sometime in the past month, I performed an upgrade > > > to my unstable debian. (apt-get update/upgrade) and possibly (i can't > > > remember, a dist-upgrade. > > > > > > I'm now getting a seg fault on a few commands., but repeatable is > > > when attempting to run df. > > > > > > Can anyone suggest a way I can resolve the issue? My ultimate aim is to > > > fix without a reinstall the box. (but if needed, I guess I will). > > > > > > Probably the one thing that might be the issue is I am running > > > 2.5.72 kernel. > > > > > > Here's my seg fault (not that it will help much, but show my pain I > > > guess :-) > > > > > > sebago:~# df > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > > <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > > > 00000018 > > > printing eip: > > > 00000018 > > > *pde = 00000000 > > > Oops: 0000 [#14] > > > CPU: 0 > > > EIP: 0060:[<00000018>] Not tainted > > > EFLAGS: 00010246 > > > eax: 0000010c ebx: 08051228 ecx: 00000054 edx: 0000007b > > > esi: bffff420 edi: 40156510 ebp: c438a000 esp: c438bfc0 > > > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 > > > Process df (pid: 9407, threadinfo=c438a000 task=c326ace0) > > > Stack: c010904f 08051228 00000054 bffff420 bffff420 40156510 bffff408 > > > 0000010c > > > 0000007b 0000007b 0000010c 400f0334 00000073 00000246 bffff3b0 > > > 0000007b > > > Call Trace: [<c010904f>] > > > Code: Bad EIP value. > > > Segmentation fault > > > > > > > > > -- > > > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > > > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
