<quote who="Ken Foskey"> > For the record. I believe that LGPL is the only true Open Source license.
Don't go down this road. "Open Source" and "Free Software" have definitions. You may feel that the LGPL is an excellent choice for your intent with a particular piece of software, but use an MIT license for something else, and that's okay. There's nothing "True" or untrue about either - it's all FOSS anyway. Choosing the right FOSS license will always be a compromise between what you want to achieve technically, your moral perspective on software freedom, who you want using it in which way, etc. There's no one answer. [ Me? I much prefer the GPL and the LGPL for my own output, when I have the choice. But that's because I'm a commercial whore, bartering style. :-) ] - Jeff -- GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway http://2004.guadec.org/ "Once this door opens, happiness waits for us. I wush to meet happiness as soon as possible by opening the door with key. Can you follow this change? Willfully darling!" - from engrish.com -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
