On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:58 am, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:50:24AM +1000, Johngibbons wrote: > > A freeware enthusiast, I am reminded of a lesson I learned when I was in > > a war: "Attack from all sides". The more groups the better. More groups > > equals a wider range and selection of tactics and stategies. One > > organisation may reduce to one approach. Go GLUG!!! > > How many totally separate armies did you have fighting on one team? > Probably only one against any one target. Although they were attacking > from all sides, they were probably under some sort of coordinated command. > > One appropriate organisation can coordinate an attack from many different > angles, whereas multiple uncoordinated organisations will probably waste > most of their energies fighting each other, rather than getting on and > slaughtering their common enemy. > > - Matt
Good point Matt. However, the assumption is that the 'one appropriate organisation' has the right strategy and resources in the first place. Also, considering the economic might of the opposition we may end up with no alternative but guerrilla warfare. John. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
