The Salisburys wrote:
Summary of connectivity

A/ 192.168.0.1 > 10.0.0.1            # YES/yes -   Always
B/ 192.168.0.1 > 10.0.0.2            # YES/yes -   Always
C/ 10.0.0.1      >  10.0.0.2           # YES/no -    EXCEPT when  2nd NAT
applied
D/ 10.0.0.1      >  192.168.0.3      # NO/yes  -    EXCEPT when 2nd NAT
applied
E/ 10.0.0.1      >  192.168.0.1      # YES/no -     BUT ONLY when route is
applied

I find C interesting ... can't ping a gateway in its own network when... !
10.0.0.2 a "gateway" but not actually defines anywhere as such.
IE : 10.0.0.x         defines 10.0.0.1       as a gateway,
       192.168.0.x  defines 192.168.0.1  as a gateway,
       192.168.0.1  defines 10.0.0.1        as a gateway,



I assume you are using iptables for NAT. We need to know what rules are set and the routes on both 10.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.1. What is the output of:


10.0.0.1: route -n
10.0.0.1: iptables -L
192.168.0.1: route -n
192.168.0.1: iptables -L

Fil
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to