<quote who="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> > James Gray wrote: > >there. If only it was KDE - heheh. I look forward to seeing what comes > >up. > > Actually I wonder how does Gnome 2.8 compare with the KDE I have now on > debian testting as far as usability goes - can you tell if it's complete > now?
If it's complete? What was missing? > I'd love to try gnome 2.8 but only have one box to play with and no time > to fix it if I break it in the process. You could try the latest Ubuntu or Gnoppix LiveCDs. > Can anyone with experience with both env's say what the latest Gnome feels > like compared to the latest KDE? They taste different. There are some feature inequalities, depending on what you find important. KDE has options out the wazoo, even to the point of including a search interface in their control panel. GNOME is concentrating on its 'Just Works' philosophy, so that in-depth, technical configuration becomes unnecessary. It comes down to what you know and what you like. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australia http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ "Stick to your guns and get it right." - Havoc Pennington -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
