On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:20:03PM +1300, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> My /etc/dhcp.conf currently looks like that below; everything else
> commented out.
>
> When I write a subnet declaration for 192.168.0.0 and for 192.168.0.1
> (server -
> presumably the "network segment to which interface start is attached") I
> get the
> message that the two conflict.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Adam
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 {
> > option domain-name "paradise.net.nz";
> > option broadcast-address 192.168.0.1;
> > option routers 192.168.0.1;
> > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.224;
> > range 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2;
> > default-lease-time 21600;
> > max-lease-time 21600;
> >}
> >#subnet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.24 {Whoa! The specification should be 'subnet <network address> netmask <mask>'. First rule: network addresses always end in even numbers. I think you need to redescribe your problem, because I'm getting a bit of a mixed messsage from the random-quoted stuff at the bottom of your message. - Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
