> I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion > won't apepar in every thread though.
I think it is useful and important to let banks and providors know that if they are not up to scratch, they will lose business. As such, I think mentioning the 'switch' alternative is more relevant is some of the posts. Also - certainly switching banks is, for many people 'really easy' and in the case of St George much easier than getting their poxy interface working. Stu On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:35, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote: > > But of course, who wouldn't weigh up the financial implications? > > I have no idea who wouldn't, but I wouldn't call such a decision "really > easy" as you did in your initial post. Alas, these considerations mean > that the "latest way to use St George Internet banking with Linux" may > be with us for some time. I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion > won't apepar in every thread though. > > -Mary -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
