On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:16:57 +1100 (EST), Voytek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <quote who="Michael Fox"> > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:23:28 +1100 (EST), Voytek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael, Jeff, thanks > > > WAG54G = wireless router/adsl modem all in one > > WRT54G = wireless router (with wan ports to add ADSL or cable ethernet > > modem) > > WAP54G = wireless access point. > > Michael, > one aspect I still can't understand, in the context of wireless access, > what is the advantage of WAP unit over WAG or WRT ? either WAG or WRT give > me wireless access point, no ?
Sorry, I don't understand your question. If you just want an AP device on your lan to allow for some wireless clients, then you could use a WAP or a WRT. The WRT is cheaper, and with sveasoft firmware can be configured to be a wireless access point. Plus still have grunt to do some other fancy things. It would allow you to have your wireless client on a different IP range and then route this onto the existing lan. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
