[SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

[Rod Butcher]

Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office 
from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot 
using nautilus and changing the conf files.  Apache now returns "You 
don't have permission to access /bookmarks.htm on this server" to the 
browser.
I don't have this problem if I copy the webserver directory to another 
ext3 partition - seemingly proving that I'm changing the necessary conf 
info.
So - is there something different about ext and vfat security, 
necessitating some more sophisticated directory copy process ?
Thanks
Rod
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html