On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:33:58 +1000 Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So even though the package is dated Jull 2001 it might still be > patched? Ok.
Yes, well, I'm not sure where that date is from. On my fc3: $ openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003 $ rpm -ql openssl |xargs ls -ld | grep /lib/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 933408 Oct 5 23:01 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213600 Oct 5 23:01 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a Odd eh? > Its because he already has good evidence that his machine has been > compromised or at the very least is being used to relay spam and that > its prbably not the MTA's fault. Yeah, if I'd read that first, I probably wouldn't have bothered responding to this one. Matt -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
