Glen Turner wrote:
I've re-written the code using more normal C idioms.
I should note that I wouldn't have done it this
way by preference, I'm just showing David where
he went wrong.
Personally I'd have done
for (p = "This is a test"; *p; p++) {
putchar(*p + 1);
}
which also would have made the *p=255 issue someone else's
problem :-)
--
Glen Turner Tel: (08) 8303 3936 or +61 8 8303 3936
Australia's Academic & Research Network www.aarnet.edu.au
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
