On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:56:39 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
> smbd[27392]: Denied connection from (0.0.0.0)
> smbd[27392]: [2005/05/25 15:09:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(975)
> smbd[27392]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not
> connected
It's probably not a hack attempt. I saw lots of these from a Windoze
2000 client when I first set up my samba 3.0.7 domain controller, and
although I don't remember how I fixed it, as soon as I read your message
I thought of dns problems. The first hit on google also mentions dns,
so maybe that really is the cause.
I had a new WinXP machine on my network on Sunday night, and it caused
similar errors. This new machine was using dhcp and I don't have dns
set up for my dhcp address range, which also suggests dns as the cause.
Make sure that your windows hostname and ip address match the dns
entries, and that there's a reverse dns entry for that ip address which
returns the correct hostname.
Cheers,
John
--
This paragraph gave me a vision of something that will probably be
possible in a year or two, if it isn't now: you crashing his wince thing
with some DoS attack run from your Palm Pilot.
-- Ben
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
