Hi,

I don't want to promote any particular database - certainly Oracle is on
the high ground. That being said, I caught the first half of the Open
Systems Forum yesterday. MySQL themselves presented, but also
CommSecure, a local system integrator that uses open source platforms
exclusivley. Both HSBC and St. George were mentioned as users of the
CommSecure payments and trading solutions. They have used MySQL in the
past but now normally deploy with PostgresSQL.

I also know that HP has being heavily promoting it's relationship with
Sabre Holdings (they have the lion's share of travel bookings) and they
use MySQL on the backend to do process millions of transactions a day.

http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/001864.html


http://www.hplinuxroadshow.com/index.php?site=expect&company=mysql

BTW If you watch the video and hear a strine accent from the Sabre guy
you'd be right. Alan is from just south of Campbelltown (we came 2nd and
3rd in 4 Unit maths at our high school) and is now one the Sabre VPs!

So I guess there are at least some companies willing to bet their bottom
line on the open source databases!

Martin

  

Martin Visser, CISSP
Network and Security Consultant 
Consulting & Integration
Technology Solutions Group - HP Services

410 Concord Road
Rhodes NSW  2138
Australia 

Mobile: +61-411-254-513
Fax: +61-2-9022-1800     
E-mail: martin.visserAThp.com

This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
confidential, proprietary or privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify HP immediately by return email and then delete
the email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the
information in it.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jamie Honan
Sent: Tuesday, 19 July 2005 9:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Pros & Cons of Unix databases

On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:20:22AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >>>>> "Howard" == Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Howard> Can anyone provide pointers to good reading material on the 
> Howard> comparisons between the various Unix databases.

Peter Chubb:
> I'm interested in this too.  The general impression I get from `real'
> users is that Oracle is the only choice for a serious database app at 
> the moment.  Personally, I'd prefer to use an open-source engine; but 
> then you have Postgres as the only serious contender.  Msql and mysql,

> SQlite, grokbase, etc., are fairly limited (although reasonably fast 
> for small-scale use).  At least, that's my impression.

For very large sites, expensive if things go wrong, I've seen Oracle and
several years ago, Informix used. Informix especially on SCO.

Mysql would have been out of the question years ago, with no support for
transactions. Now, I'm not so sure.

The impression I get with Oracle is that it is safe bet, and risk
aversion is one of the priorities for many people.

The major thing that a database is used for, especially in web apps.
is concurrancy control. This is a huge issue with the numbers of users
and numbers of hits that large sites have.

This document, I think, gives a pretty good roundup of the kinds of
sites that have grown up.
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/Service%20Architectures.doc
(Unfortunately the graphics don't scale properly in OpenOffice, but they
are very worthwhile.) I hope to base some of my talk on Apache2, large
sites and concurrancy on some of it.

The author makes the point that everyone starts off treating the db as a
'blackbox' sql engine, with interfaces such as perl dbi, but before long
starts to integrate more and more into things like PL/SQL and embedding
special constructs in their application code.
That's been my experience too.

However, I despair of SQL databases. They don't have rich expressions,
their performance is hopeless.

Many a warehouse, accounting and invoicing systems are still run on
Pick/Universe.

As for small scale use, I think databases are often used when they
shouldn't be. The filesystem is a pretty good database too,

Just my 2c.
Jamie
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to