You might like to look at the features of a NetApp filer. Particulary the
snapshots and dual partity raid features.

I recently evaluated some NAS systems. An essential requirement was for
users to be able to restore their own files from snapshots. I would not do
file serving to the average user group without it. (of course tape backup
is still essential.)

BB

on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:27:41PM +1000, Rajnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> 
> I would like to get your esteemed opinion on a number of queries 
> concerning NAS. But first a background - our LAN accomodates a number
> of diff OSes, including Solaris, Linux, Win2K and WinXP.
> 
> We would like to attach NAS device(s) on the LAN, and be able to access
> storage space from all the above OSes. In particular, it is important
> that NAS devices support NFS - to enable Un*x boxes to mount the space.
> 
> The space is to be used both as permanent storage as well as "overflow"
> workspaces for our developers.
> 
> Questions:
> 1) Is NAS a suitable solution for such an environment ? If a case is to
> be made for/against it, what are the ups and downs ?
> 
> 2) More importantly, what are your experiences with dealing with these
> devices ? Do they support NFS ?
> 
> 3) Your experiences with speed and reliability ? We have particularly 
> large files (200MB-2GB) to deal with and compiles includes a large
> number of files.
> 
> Any tips, suggestions, references will be appreciated.
> 
> Thanking you all in anticipation. Please reply to NG for future
> reference.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Rajnish
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
Bevan Broun
Systems Engineer
THALES
Services Division
W: (02) 9562 2861
M: 0407 225 492
F: (02) 9562 2857
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to