On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 10:00:15AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sunday 19 March 2006 09:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>Someone reccomends ubuntu, maybe I don't remember the sys-admin, I > > >> strongly reccomend SuSE, get 9.3 not 10. > > > > > >Recommending a previous version of a distribution over its current version > > >is a pretty poor recommendation. That means the distribution is going > > > backwards. > > > > Normally I would agree, but in the case of SuSE I have also recommended > > 9.3 over 10.0 to newbies.
Er, I think you're actually in agreement here. 'a pretty poor recommendation' meant that a distro that goes backwards is a pretty poor distro, not that the recommendation itself (to choose 9.3 over 10.0) is poor. Matt -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
