On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:44, Lindsay Holmwood wrote: > On 3/22/06, O Plameras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You should just leave the policy making to the Slug Committee. Your time > > is over. > > Speaking on behalf of the committee, we side with Jeff's assessment of > proper etiquette on the Slug list.
Speaking as an observer, considering joining SLUG, I'll say that I saw Jeff descending into "oh, yeah?" type responses myself. And I was not impressed when he didn't write something like: "We discussed this in ____ meeting, and decided on the SLUG position and it's _______" or "You can find the written guidelines here ______" Nothing I read in his messages gave me reason to know that this was anything more official than a strongly held personal opinion, used as an attack. As for the committee's opinion, what about the membership's? Was this voted on? That would be legitimate - but you haven't mentioned that, either, I notice. It might be so, but no one is saying that, so I'll admit I'm wondering a bit about the culture of this LUG now. Regards, Bret
pgpX6pF1BP7Gh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
