On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:18:53 +1100 Matt Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:34:03PM +1100, Alan L Tyree wrote: > > OK, against my better judgment I just had a look at the Windows 98 > > EULA. The licence is to install it on one computer, but there are no > > stated restrictions on how that installation might be done. So, my > > quick opinion (with no warranties at all - see below :-)) is that it > > can be installed under qemu provided that the software came with, or > > was purchased for, the machine in question. > > I suspect your interpretation may be at odds with that of Microsoft -- > otherwise you could run a dozen qemu- or vmware-encased images > simultaneously on the same (very, very chunky) computer legally, > which I doubt is their intention. It may be necessary to restrict running to one - also note that I was looking at the W98 EULA. MS may have become wiser in later versions. > > On the other hand, you may have two copies, but you've only capable > of using one at once (absent any crazy attempts to run > XP-in-qemu-in-XP or similar), so I really can't see anyone getting > amazingly upset about it. I think that is the point: the purpose of the clause is to restrice usage to one running copy on one machine. That isn't violated. In the event that the clause is ambiguous (which this discussion verifies) then looking at the purpose is one way forward. Not the only way, unfortunately :-) > > - Matt > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: +61 2 4782 2670 Mobile: +61 428 148 071 Fax: +61 2 4782 7092 FWD: 615662 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
