On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 18:24 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat 20 May, 2006 at 21:54:17 +1000, Michael Kedzierski wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Diazepam (Trent Murray) asked on IRC if anyone was interested in
> > restarting the old Python SIG again.
> > 
> > It has come up in further discussion that a few people would like to
> > see a Python and Ruby combined special interest group. We're thinking
> > about combining both because we feel the languages really are quite
> > similar, and it would probably make things more interesting.
> > 
> > So, what does everybody think of reviving the old Python SIG, and
> > possibly combining it with a Ruby one?
> 
> Definately a hand of interest here. Count me in.

Interesting email address... pity it doesn't exist.

A small request if you would, please dont use From: address's from
domains you don't own. There are many reasons why you shouldn't do this,
ranging from simple courtesy, to having your mail reach its intended
recipients - SPF checking mail systems will reject your bogus mail with
extreme prejudice.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to