<quote who="Terry Collins"> > > But Terry, remember that anyone can subscribe to SLUG (no, we should > > definitely not moderate subscription requests), and what they do with > > the mail is up to them. > > I disagree about moderation. If you look around, you will see that the > FOSS/OSS/???/linux/*nix communities are covered in layers of licences.
Explain your proposed policy for moderating subscriptions instead of trying to equate software licensing with people. > It is also about that much abused term "community". Just what sort of > community do you want the Slug community to be? Open, fun, connected, sharing, teaching, learning, approachable, boisterous at times, vibrant, eclectic and passionate. > It is not about copyright. > It is not about spam on the slug list. > Nor is it about the knowledge base. > > It is basically that SLUG could do be doing something more. If SLUG could be doing more, what could it be doing? Explain the solution to the problem you present. Note: Legalese is not a solution. - Jeff -- GUADEC 2006: Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain http://2006.guadec.org/ "Stick to your guns and get it right." - Havoc Pennington -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
