On Tuesday 19 September 2006 19:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think it would be neat if people sent future correspondence like this > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's a few hundred people getting this message > who either don't care about administrivia, or are in no position to > actually do anything about it. > > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 16:34 +1000, Lindsay Holmwood wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > We're sorting through some continuing issues with the spam filters on > > our lists. If you could bare with us, that'd be great. > > > > Cheers! > > Lindsay > > > > On 9/19/06, Martin Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear moderators, > > > > > > I have noticed that my last 3 posts to SLUG, which are very innocuous, > > > are being bounced for moderation, with a message that they are filtered > > > out based on headers. Not sure what is causing this, but it seems that > > > paranoia filters might be set a little high.. (And I am sending from a > > > subscribed address)
That assumes that orniary users get the 'moderator bla' message and are not concerned ...? I found that the > > We're sorting through some continuing issues with the spam filters on > > our lists. If you could bare with us, that'd be great. message was useful and polite. I would not have seen it on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list so thanks from me. James -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
