[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/01/2007 07:11:47 AM: > > Hi folks, > I'm currently seeing around half the incoming emails rejected at > SMTP conversation time (hurray), with spam scores averaging 21 or so. > (I play it fairly safe, only scores above 20 get rejected) > > The ones that get through have scores between -1 and 7; there doesn't > seem to be a middle ground. > > I currently quarantine anything with a score between 4 and 5 and take a look > once a day (if I leave it too long, there're too many messages and I > can't check them all). Once or twice a month there'll be some ham in > there; I haven't seen any ham in the over 5 score in a long time.
If you don't see any ham with a score above 5, why not set your reject to score of 5 or 6? IMHO its better for a sender to get "Your Mail has been rejected due to suspected spam", then the email getting lost in the spam box never to be seen. Cheers, Scott -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
