I am not a good interpreter of log files but a search of the mail.log came up with the following line which would appear to be relevant:
amavis[3692]: (03692-04) Blocked BANNED (multipart/mixed | image/jpeg,.exe,.exe-ms,FTLINK40.jpg), [ip number] <senders email address> -> <my email address>, quarantine: banned-A53A50k3vlJk, Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id: A53A50k3vlJk, Hits: -, 3 9533 ms which would tend to suggest that its amavis doing the rejecting but I'm not much closer to objective. J On 1/23/07, Oliver Hookins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/23/07, Matthew Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Someone recommended dspam -- but www.dspam.org > is old and been claimed by some squatter/exploiter. > > Time to laugh or cry... > http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/ ...if you are a real masochist. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
