I agree, Jeff. This is ridiculous.
I can say that where I work we're often *required*, for the sake of accuracy, to put 'profanities' in e-mail and other correspondence.
The material is required and is therefore not gratuitous, but it makes me laugh when I think of what happens in other places.
It's create a monumental problem if some bright spark decided to filter 'naughty' words :))
Regards, Patrick
3. Misspelling worse than profanity [Was: [SLUG] Asterix Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:35:22 +1100 <quote who="Jeff Waugh">"You know, the crunchy, folk-singer part of me wants to believe that a performance is a dialogue, but I can't hear a BEEPing thing you're saying." - Ani DiFrancoI just received a "your message has been blocked due to PROFANITY" email in response to this. At which point did we become litigious enough in this country to require or suggest that an employer protect their staff from normal communication with the outside world? Coddlers. - Jeff
-- Registered Linux User 368634 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
