On Sat, March 10, 2007 12:02 am, Howard Lowndes wrote: > I used to use postgrey, but it got too much of a PITA with my clients > when the client would complain saying that their inbound correspondent had > just phoned to say: "I have just sent you an email, have you got it?", and > they expected it to be in their email inbox instantly. > > Email != IM.
well, luckily (for me) I told my users to premept the delay issues, "we're introducing greylisting and...", and, had no real probs; then, I noticed, some of their correspondents were already using it, so, I pointed it out to them as well; I guess I've been lucky, but, I tell them 'very authoritatively', and, they think I am > My point is that postgrey has a much more friendly approach to telling > the sender why the email has been delayed in delivery. I think that's what I tried 1st, but, then felt than policyd was 'better choice', don't recall the reasons anymore BTW, looking at my personal rejection summaries, it seems my spam input greatly reduced lately, I used to get an average of 400 reject per day, now it seems I average just 100 rejects per day -- Voytek -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
