On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:35:10AM +0000, Amos Shapira wrote: > On 05/10/2007, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > looks like they are sending a > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > when it should be a > > > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Shouldn't the "<>" mean that anything outside it should be ignored? from vague memory its
"" <> the "" is the textual stuff and the <> is the actual address So "This is an email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is a valid address > > (Haven't looked at the RFC for ages either, though). > > --Amos > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
