On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:08 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > >Perhaps it would be useful to say, > > > "we're only really interested in talking to your Open Source > Office > > > people". :-) > > > > I don't think that that is useful, particularly as its not true. > > Er, what is not true?
The clause in your sentence following 'perhaps it would be useful to say' (which is the obvious binding :)). so... > c) Perhaps it would be useful to say, "we're only really interested > in > talking to your Open Source Office people". (Are you suggesting it > wouldn't > be useful to say this?) I'm saying its not true that 'we're only really interested...' because: - I'd certainly be interested in anyone up the management chain from the open source office - folk from the open source office are really not interested to me for the reasons I pointed out.. > I never claimed that company-wide policy was set in the Open Source > Office, > in fact I've made the same point you have re: decision-making on a > number of > occasions in the thread (particularly where it migrated to other > lists). I did not claim that you made such a claim [there's no need to highlight that you didn't make that claim]; I said that such folk are not interesting because they don't set policy high enough up in the company to prevent the behaviour that is the issue here... -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
