Yes that was the example I found too. I'm still not sure about
multi-threaded CPU's though....

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 07:43 +1000, James Polley wrote:
> I was going to say something,
> but http://www.teamquest.com/resources/gunther/display/5/index.htm
> says it much better than I can, so I'll just go back to bed.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Dean Hamstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>         multiple cores are seen as multiple cpus. so there is no
>         difference.
>         
>         i dont know how threads are implemented in the cpu.
>         
>         a load average of 2.0 on a dual cpu (or dual core) system is a
>         100% load average. accroding to man.
>         
>         
>         Dean
>         
>         
>         Sonia Hamilton wrote:
>                 A question about uptime. My understanding of the load
>                 average figures is
>                 that a figure less than 2.0 on a 2 CPU machine means
>                 the CPUs don't have
>                 more work than they can keep up with (on average).
>                 
>                 How is this figure (1 per CPU) affected on multicore
>                 CPUs? What about
>                 multi-threaded CPU's?
>                 
>         -- 
>         
>         
>         SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
>         http://slug.org.au/
>         Subscription info and FAQs:
>         http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> There is nothing more worthy of contempt than a man who quotes himself
> - Zhasper, 2004
-- 
Thanks,
.
Sonia Hamilton
http://soniahamilton.wordpress.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/soniahamilton
.
I want to share something with you -- the three sentences that will get you 
through life. Number one, "Cover for me." Number two, "Oh, good idea, boss."
Number three, "It was like that when I got here." -- Homer Simpson

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to