On Friday 23 May 2008 10:00:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kyle wrote:
> > errrrrr ................ GULP!!!!!!!
> >
> > Ok! <he says meekly>
> >
> > Thanks. I'll just walk before I go for the Olympics I think.
>
> For the record, if you're recording DVB-t, you really don't need much
> CPU grunt in either the back-end or front-end.  All it's doing is
> pulling the appropriate stream our of what's coming down the antenna and
> spooling it off to disk.  There's no transcoding or anything involved.
>
> If you want to do ad detection on the commercial channels, that might
> need some CPU power, though in my experience it's the disk thrashing
> that's more of an issue.
>
> In standard definition, MPEG decoder hardware means the CPU can be
> pretty puny on the front-end.
>
> Seriously, spend your money on disks -- which are cheap too (<$300/TB
> these days).  I find with free-to-air only and my viewing habits, about
> 600 gigs is plenty, and there's still loads of stuff I never get around
> to.  I probably watch at most 6 hours of telly a week though, so perhaps
> I'm not typical?  The beauty of MythTV, though, is that it's all
> thriller, no filler.  No ads either.

Kyle you can certainly start playing with very modest hardware!

Has anybody got reasonable results with the ad-detection ?

I find Channel 7 keeps breaking the system so badly that 50% is unusable.
[eg black screen in mid movie triggers ad detection]

I even set ad-duration to 300 secs to try to avoid

movie|ad ad|movie|ad ad|movie just omitting
                     ^^^^ 
                               entirely.

10 is probably the best, but still so bad that I don't use it.

I've tried each and all ad-detection algorithms.

My antenna is a bit iffy, maybe that is to blame ?
Watch performance is a squeek or a block of pixels say once / hour.

James
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to