On Sunday 25 May 2008 10:00:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Has anybody got reasonable results with the ad-detection ?

[snip]

> You are correct in thinking it is your antenna, most of the time it  
> is; together with all the bits-n-pieces.
>
> Of course you will have to have reasonably good coax and depending  
> where you live (or trying to DTV record), that you may be best getting  
> someone to check your signal strength at the your antenna and at the  
> end-points ti.e.: where cable connects to your DVB card/TV.
>
> Why? It is my experience that most people have old really crappy coax,  
> and highly suspect splitters/baluns/connections + you name it.  You  
> can do this yourself if your got a laptop (running either dvb-scan or  
> scan-dvb. It will tell you the signal strengths for each channel),  
> with a USB DVB device and you can simply get to the antenna base point.

[snip]

Graham thanks for lots of input. What I was trying to establish was two stuff:

I have a pair of bunny-ears above my table. The signal is crappy. SD and HD 
are perfect except for a stutter say once per hour. So ...

1) Does anybody get reasonable ad detection ?
2) If they do (and I don't) then it's probably the antenna

I've used lots of backends from repos and from building from 0.14 to 
0.21-fixes
CPUs from Celeron 1700 thru the dual core AMDs. Everything-else (but antenna) 
is eliminated.
Even recorded simultainously on differant TV cards and compared recordings.

James 
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to