On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:48:39PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:53:09PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > John Ferlito wrote: > >> > > >> >> In my opinion SPF pretty much protects you from one thing, joe-job
[snip] > > Sure. I make no claim that it is impossible, simply that it is hard and > costly. You don't happen to know what their internal cost for that > project was, do you? 1 person, left over equipment, maybe done over 2 weeks as it was done in his spare time. Motivation sick and tired of the windows machines running out of resources scanning for virus etc... on spam mail. This machine was just a smtp gateway, that used spamassassin > > (I would bet at least a couple of full time people for a couple of > weeks, plus planning and management overheads.) > > Again, as I wrote: > > >> Which isn't to say that it wouldn't be worth the cost, just that it > >> isn't nearly as small as you seem to suggest. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter what it does. -- Will Rogers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
