Marghanita,

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Marghanita da Cruz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sylvia,
>
> If people bother to reply to you, they are  not claiming defeat, just
> questioning whether it is worthwhile putting any effort into another
> government enquiry - particularly one labelled "innovation".

Why bother replying to me then as I have obviously already decided to
put in some effort? If it's not worth putting effort behind the
activity why waste time telling others to not bother either?

>  Saying your
> not interested in viewpoints that may diverge from your enthusiasm for this
> enquiry doesn't encourage any positive input what so ever.

I am not asking about positive input, I am asking about constructive
input. I am no more or no less critical about the potential of a
positive outcome of this effort. But at least I can say I tried to
help.

> By the way the chair of the committee who wrote this report was Brand Hoff
> of Tower Software
> <http://www.acs.org.au/publication/docs/ICTSMEJWP-IndustryReportFINAL.pdf>
> <http://www.towersoft.com/global/News+and+Events/News+Room/Press+Releases/HP+acquires+TOWER+Software/>

Thanks for the constructive input. :-)

Cheers,
Silvia.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to