Just thought that folks would like to know that M$, having embraced the 
various email protocols (RFC2821, RFC2822, etc), is now in the process 
of extending them.

I periodically send a bulk email, but individually addressed to each 
recipient, to about 40 of my most intimate friends advising them of 
upcoming events at my local LUG. One of the recipients has a hotmail 
address.

This morning's short missive advised about SFD08. The mail addressed to 
the hotmail account was, for the first time, bounced by M$ Live Mail, 
with a typically unhelpful message explaining that it was for "policy" 
reasons that might be related to spam or might be related to a sender's 
FQDN/dotted-quad mismatch.

Since neither the Subject nor the body of the email contained any spam 
words (unless M$ regards "Software Freedom Day" as a spam expression), 
the email contained every necessary and sufficient header, and all 
headers are RFC compliant, I came to the conclusion that the mail 
suffered from a sender's details' mismatch.

Now, my FQDN does not match the dotted-quad address, and does not 
resolve via lookup, because my IP address is dynamic and my ISP (who is 
a friend) had never bothered to add my FQDN details his IP range. He is 
now adding them in -- isn't it nice to have friends. :-)

It appears that my email ran afoul of M$'s "Sender ID Framework" (which 
of course is acronymed to SIDF).

Gee, until now I thought that only Dan Bernstein deliberately stuffed 
up email protocols. But now M$, which hitherto seemed only to stuff up 
protocols by accident out of ignorance, has joined him.

-- 
Robert Thorsby
In /dev/null no one can hear the kernel panic!

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to