On Apr 6, 7:38 pm, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/time.h.html > > "The range [0,60] seconds allows for positive or negative leap seconds. > The formal definition of UTC does not permit double leap seconds, so all > mention of double leap seconds has been removed, and the range shortened > from the former [0,61] seconds seen in previous versions of POSIX.
but they still couldn't fix the Epoch Fail http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/epochtime.html -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
