On 13/05/2010 11:54, Lindsay Holmwood wrote:
On 13 May 2010 10:52, Nigel Allen<[email protected]> wrote:
Questions:
2) Is there a GPL solution that fit's this scenario? Even if it's not a bare
metal hypervisor and needs an O/S. Remember it has to virtuaize both Server
2003 and CentOS
KVM, Sheepdog[0], and libvirt. Sheepdog eliminates the need for a SAN
or NAS, it uses the local storage on the machines to host the images.
You can scale it horizontally pretty easily by adding more machines
with big disks.
[0] http://www.osrg.net/sheepdog/
4) What kind of speed/bandwidth should we be looking at for the off-site
replication.
Wholly depends on how much IO you're doing. Is this being hosted out
of a data center? If not, it'll probably cost more more than you can
reasonably afford
Understood - I knew it was a stupid question when I asked that one.
Without going through a sizing exercise I figure it's probably going to
be left until later when we can look at some kind of async replication.
N/
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
