On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:31:42PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Also, lots of different apps, so I might well end up with multiple > solutions.
This seems likely. Databases have different consistency requirements to people. > A good distributed POSIX FS with replication, eventual > consistency, some sensible conflict resolution model, and data center > awareness would have been easy enough to use though. Conflict resolution is the problem. The less of that you want, the more synchronous your filesystem has to become - or expose more non-POSIX filesystem behaviour to applications. Nick. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
