Thanks for the thorough explanation, precisely what I was looking for.

I can't seem to get used to "reply to all" as I don't see a point in
replying to a particular address, since I'm sending the mail primarily to
the discussion. It's exactly like those BBSs where there's a "reply" button
for every post and you can only "reply to x". Well, that's a bad analogy
since in this case we are still able to "choose". This is largely because I
am, in fact, a newbie to MLs and I assumed most would default to a reply-to
header. Anyhow, I say it again, it isn't a bad thing. The Arch Linux lists
have it that way: http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/

I had no intention of proposing a change, I merely wanted to know the
reasoning behind the choice - and now I do (:

On 06/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ray Rashif wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm new to the ML and I can't help but wonder - why isn't there a
> > reply-to header set by the list admin? Most of the other lists have
> > this, and honestly it's nothing bad. In fact, it makes things easier
> > when you can just click on "reply" (or use a reply operator on a CLI
> > client) and expect the mail to be delivered to the list instead of the
> > sender (in case one forgets to include a Cc). How do you handle this
> > as it is currently?
>
>
> The LUGS mailing list currently requires you to hit "Reply to all" on
> mails intended for the list.
>
> For those interested in a rationale - there are two broad schools of
> thought on Mailing List reply semantics - whether the list should set
> the "Reply-to" header or not.
>
> The historical list netiquette (the policy used on slugnet), gnu mailman
> default and recommended method (1) is to not set the Reply-To header.
> Posters should click "Reply to All" to keep other posters on the thread
> in the discussion as they may not be subscribers - or subscribers may
> have procmail or sieve rules to handle mail To'd or Cc'd to them
> differently (e.g. I have threads that I'm involved in the To or Cc
> headers filed into a different folder to the general list traffic). This
> approach makes it easier to reply back to the poster if you so wish
> (without copying and pasting their address). Lists with this reply
> policy include the linux-kernel mailing list, all of the debian lists,
> and most other long standing open source projects...
>
> The alternative netiquette is for the list to set the Reply-To header so
> that replies always go to the list. This is supposed to make sure that
> discussion is kept on list (and also makes sure posts from newbies who
> forget to hit "Reply-to-All" make it to the list). Many find this policy
> quite restricting as whether you click "Reply" or "Reply-to-All", you
> can't get it to reply to the original poster (2) - only the list - so
> you need to copy and paste the email address if you wish to post only to
> the sender. This policy is used by lists that have a lot of subscribers
> who are not aware of the historical practices of Internet mailing lists
> and are unaware of the rational behind doing it the right way™
> (mentioned above) :)
>
> If you can garner support for changing the policy for slugnet, then we
> could take a vote (3) amongst the list members - in the mean time just
> remember to click "Reply to all" when replying to list posts - the
> method we have currently gives list posters a choice of where they want
> their mail to go rather than forcing them into one way of doing it.
>
> Let the debating begin :) It's all in good humour ;)
>
> ~mc
>
> [1] Gnu mailman option for where are replies to list messages are
> directed says 'Poster' is *strongly//* recommended for most mailing lists.
> [2] Mozilla Thunderbird for example is unable to override Reply-to set
> by the list and if the poster *chooses* to post only to the sender, then
> he has to resort to cumbersome copy and paste operations.
> [3] Please reply to me off-list and I'll tally and post the results -
> BTW if we had Reply-To set we couldn't easily do this, we would be
> sending many hundreds of mails out with just yes/no spamming everyone on
> the list.
>
_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to