On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Harish Pillay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks - > > I think it is a false alarm. The method (look at the zip file and > view the file called > specifications with claims file (a .tiff file) in evince or something > not an image viewer > because you will not see the pages), is really about having some PGP > embedded > in the image/video/photo/logo/trademark etc that will be authenticated. > One > needs a browser plugin as well as server software. A reasonably > clever idea, IMHO, > but completely useless in practical terms. > > People, including me, jumped on the headlines without checking the claims > first. > Now that I have read the specs, I think it is has been a wasted morning. > in that case, though, who did they send that "invoice" to that you link to in http://harishpillay.livejournal.com/107164.html? these guys (the "invoicee") actually implemented that? -jf -- In the meantime, here is your PSA: "It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help." -- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
_______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
