Ha. Precisely the koyok that I get attending TechEd SEA year after year:
"Even LSE runs MS stack, and it never crashed." Time to update the training
slides. 

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hendra
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:39 AM
To: Slugnet
Subject: [Slugnet] London Stock Exchange suffers .NET Crash

 

http://blogs.computerworld.com/london_stock_exchange_suffers_net_crash

London Stock Exchange suffers .NET Crash

It should have been a great day on the London Stock Exchange. The U.S.
government had announced on the Sunday before that it was coming to the
rescue of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Trading would have been extremely
brisk, but then, at 9:15 AM GMT, the Exchange's software failed due to
<http://www.forbes.com/markets/2008/09/08/london-exchange-update-markets-equ
ity-cx_vr_0908markets24.html> "connectivity issues." Six-hours and
45-minutes later, the London Exchange, along with the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange, which uses the LSE's trading platform TradElec, were finally back
up. 

That was no consolidation to traders. As Reuters
<http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSL01084620080908>  reported, "We
have the biggest takeover in the history of the known world ... and then we
can't trade. It's terrible," one trader said. 

So what happened? Officially, the
<http://www.forbes.com/markets/2008/09/09/london-exchange-update2-markets-eq
uity-cx_vr_0909markets07.html>  LSE first said that, "We will be
investigating this and will do everything we can to make sure this doesn't
reoccur." Later the
<http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSL
9953120080909>  LSE gave the vague explanation, that "It was
software-related, a coincidence, due to two processes we couldn't have
foreseen," and not caused by high-volume. The spokesperson added, "We've
introduced a fix and we're confident it will not happen again." 

Somehow "we couldn't have foreseen" and "we're confident it will not happen
again" don't fit very well together. 

So what really happened? I doubt we'll ever get a detailed, nitty-gritty
explanation, but I have friends in London and... Well, let me just make the
following points about TradElec. First, TradElec runs on more than a 100 HP
ProLiant servers in several locations in London. These servers are running
Windows Server 2003. 

On top of this runs the TradElec software itself. This is a custom set of C#
and .NET programs, which was created by Microsoft and Accenture
<http://www.accenture.com/home/default.htm> , the global consulting firm.
Its back-end databases, believe it or not, run on Microsoft SQL Server 2000.
The goal was to maintain sub-ten millisecond response times. In short, it's
meant to be a real-time system. 

The programmers and serious database administrators in the audience can
already see where this is going. Sorry, Microsoft, .NET Framework is simply
incapable of performing this kind of work, and SQL Server 2000, or any
version of SQL Server really, can't possibly handle the world's number three
stock exchange's transaction load on a consistent basis. 

I'd been hearing from friends who trade on the LSE for ages about how slow
the system could get. Now, I know why. 

What I find really amazing is that the LSE's software stack hadn't blown its
top earlier. Even setting aside my feelings for Linux, there's simply no way
I'd recommend Server 2003, .NET and SQL Server for a job even a tenth this
size. If a customer of mine insisted that they didn't want open source -
more fool them - I'd recommended Sun Solaris, JEE (Java Enterprise Edition)
and Oracle or IBM AIX or z/OS, WebSphere and DB2. 

What I'd really prefer to see is RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), JBoss, and
MySQL or Oracle or Novell's SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server), JEE, and,
again MySQL or Oracle for the DBMS engine. In any case, though, the real
moral of this story is that if you really want HA (high availability) or HPC
(high performance computing), Microsoft's products should be at the bottom
of your list. Unix, mainframes, and, yes Linux, are far, far better for
companies that need fast and reliable computing. 

You don't have to believe me though. The New
<http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&art
icleId=9053008>  York Stock Exchange has already started to use Linux on its
servers. 

 

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to