[http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/03/microsoft-and-tomtom-settle-patent-dispute.ars]

=====
Microsoft and TomTom settle patent dispute

Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial patent dispute,
which included allegations that the Linux kernel infringes on
Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom has licensed the patents from
Microsoft, but intends to remove from its Linux kernel the code that
is covered by the patents.
By Ryan Paul | Last updated March 30, 2009 12:45 PM CT

[...]

In an announcement Monday, Microsoft and TomTom contend that the terms
of the settlement fully conform with TomTom's obligations under the
GPL, the license under which Linux is distributed. TomTom has paid to
license Microsoft's patents, including those covering FAT.

TomTom will, however, remove the functionality that is covered under
the FAT patents. This will guarantee that the code in TomTom's Linux
kernel can continue to be broadly redistributed downstream without
patent encumbrances. This aspect of the agreement, along with
specificity about which patents are infringed, are major factors that
differentiate this agreement from Microsoft's controversial deal with
Novell.

[...]

Although the settlement has ended the conflict between Microsoft and
TomTom, questions still remain about the implications for FAT in the
broader Linux ecosystem. Microsoft has previously stated that this
lawsuit represents an isolated issue and that the company does not
intend to broadly sue Linux users. Upstream kernel developers could
potentially adopt TomTom's code changes in order to avoid future
patent disputes with Microsoft over FAT.
=====
-- 
Soh Kam Yung
my Google Reader Shared links:
(http://www.google.com/reader/shared/16851815156817689753)
my Google Reader Shared SFAS links:
(http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/16851815156817689753/label/sfas)

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to