On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Jette, Moe wrote: > The problem was that a reservation's times may advance a short time after it > completes. This could permit a job to be scheduled in the time period after > it completes and before the reservation records time stamps get advanced. > The attached patch will advance a reservation's time stamps in several > additional places, which should prevent any job from being scheduled at > the time of a future reservation. > > I expect to get this change in SLURM version 2.2.3, which we can release > later this week.
Very good, thanks Moe! /Per -- Per Lundqvist National Supercomputer Centre Linköping University, Sweden http://www.nsc.liu.se
