Tyler, have you tried putting 'extern' in front of the function declaration? I know that fixed the issue in the priority plugin. It is a complete stab in the dark, but it might work.
extern should probably be put in front of all those function declarations. Let us know if that makes any difference. Danny On Thursday, May 12, 2011 05:43:41 PM Tyler Strickland wrote: > On 05/12/2011 04:25 PM, Jette, Moe wrote: > > The function _slurm_destroy_association_shares_object() is declared, > > although several header files are used in the path: > > > > /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/common/slurm_protocol_defs.h included > > from /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/common/checkpoint.h:47, > > from /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/slurmctld/slurmctld.h:70 > > from /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/common/slurm_accounting_ > > from /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/common/assoc_mgr.h:48, > > from /g/g0/jette/slurm.chaos/src/common/assoc_mgr.c:39: > > > > Just out of curiosity, can anyone tell me why there has been a lot of > > recent interest in SLURM on OSX? Are people building Mac clusters? > > ________________________________________ > > > > btw, is the function _slurm_destroy_association_shares_object() declared > > in any header that gets included while building assoc_mgr.c? (might > > help, however, the behaviour you're seeing here is still plain *wrong* > > for gcc, prototype declared or not) > > > > regards, > > jaKa > > > > > > > > As to why the use of OS X is increasing in general, I can't say, but in > my specific case I'm working for a group of biomedical researchers > (working with DNA sequencing) at a university who have an 8-unit xserve > cluster. From what I understand, several of the programs they use only > work on macs, so they tend to use it for much of their number crunching. > > I've tried including the slurm_protocol_defs.h header file straight into > assoc_mgr.c with the same result, so I've pretty much concluded it's a > compiler bug as well. Now if I could just figure out how to work around > it... > > In the mean time I'm trying to see if cross-compiling SLURM on my linux > box might be a viable way of getting this working, but that's proving to > be no small challenge in and of itself - just getting the compiler to > compile is a hassle. > > Thanks, > Tyler >
