[email protected] writes: > Thanks for the patch. I can understand how this logic would be very slow for > systems with large numbers of jobs. Regarding the second patch, do not > believe the "else" portion of code is needed. If you have seen no problems > running over the past week, that is a good sign that logic is not > needed.
We have seen no problems so far. > I have applied both patches to the SLURM version 2.3 code base, where > it can be tested more before being released. Nice, thanks! -- Cheers, Bjørn-Helge
