On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:14:15 +0100 "Yuri D'Elia" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Third: I was expecting GANG to suspend jobs only if a job with a higher > priority is present in the queue, but what I see is that jobs with _equal_ > priority also get preempted. Is there a way to avoid this? > > The resulting behavior is kind of unexpected for me: twice as many jobs are > immediately scheduled on the nodes (due to FORCE:2), saturating the > resources. As a result, an entering new job with a higher priority will have > to wait twice as much to be running, which is exactly the opposite of what I > would like to accomplish. > > Thanks for any hint. Any suggestion about this?
