Hi Danny, Yes, I can work on this. It should not take too much time.
Regards On 01/27/2012 07:42 PM, Danny Auble wrote: > Thanks for the heads up on this. It looks like this has been around > for a while now (older than 2.3.2). It will be in 2.3.4. > >> By the way, I can see that reservation time not used by anyone is >> proportional added to each assoc listed on reservation record. I wonder >> if there should be a check there for, in case the assoc has not a user >> name (so this assoc is an account), getting the assoc list from this >> account and then adding the proportional idle reservation time to those >> assocs. > This is a good idea. Like you say it could go through and find all > the user associations below the parent account (could be multiple > levels) and spread it over them and only use the account association > if no users are present (which would probably only happen very > rarely). Let me know if you have time to work on it. > WARNING / LEGAL TEXT: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, proprietary, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying, or in any way using this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy and delete any copies you may have received. http://www.bsc.es/disclaimer.htm
