Thank you Carles and Moe,

I had FastSchedule to 0, and It worked also. Now I switched to
FastSchedule=1 and 2 and it works ok.

I use task affinity and also ok.

I was using FastSchedule to 0 because after an upgrade to Slurm 2.3.3, the
real memory reported by the daemons was different and all my nodes went
down. I don't know why. When you have FastSchedule to 1, the cores, sockets
and cpus are also sent from the nodes?


Regards


2012/2/13 Moe Jette <je...@schedmd.com>

> Felip,
>
> That will work if you configure FastSchedule=1 or 2. If you also use task
> affinity, that should work, but I would recommend testing it.
>
> Moe Jette
> SchedMD
>
>
> Quoting Felip Moll <lip...@gmail.com>:
>
>  Hello all,
>>
>> I am wondering if I can set the number of cpus to a lower number than the
>> real number of cpus. I want to do this to limit the number of concurrent
>> cores accessing memory.
>>
>> Is it correct to set something like this on slurm.conf?:
>>
>> NodeName=pez001 RealMemory=32111 Sockets=2 CoresPerSocket=2
>> ThreadsPerCore=1
>>
>> By this way, the node pez001 will display 4 cores, but it has 8 physical
>> cores.
>>
>>
>> I am asking it because if you set the memory to a level different than the
>> real value, the node becames down.
>>
>>
>> Thank you a lot.
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to