On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:42:05 -0700, Danny Auble <[email protected]> wrote: > > We received you patches just fine from the list. The pull request is > fine as well though. In the future submitting patches to
I can verify that I did not get the patches in an acceptable format (The content-type was application/octet-stream) This also caused the patches to be unviewable in the google groups archive, so they are lost to posterity. > http://bugs.schedmd.com > > is our preferred way. As a member of the SLURM community I would encourage people to still send patches to the list. This allows everyone subscribed to the mail list to see proposed patches and possibly comment on them. mark > Thanks, > Danny > > On 02/22/12 08:01, Pär Andersson wrote: > > Pär Andersson<[email protected]> writes: > >> I have found and fixed a few problems related to batch jobs with long > >> argument lists. > > As the mailing list manager seem to mess up my patches I have sent a > > pull request on Github instead. > > > > https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/pull/12 > > > > https://github.com/paran1/slurm/commits/argv-fixes > > > > /Pär >
